We assume that other people are nearly always one-dimensional, and thus, predictable.Īctor-observer bias is mostly seen in the case of negative situations. When we are dealing with other people, we have no idea about the context, and therefore, we tend to assume that internal causes, i.e., their disposition, is responsible for their action. That we are well-versed with the context and prior experiences also helps. Therefore, we focus on the situation (external/environmental factor) as the reason of our behavior. We believe that other people’s behavior is all about their internal causes, but attribute our own behavior to external factors.Īs we are not able to observe our behavior directly, we cannot make internal attributions about our own behavior. As opposed to this, when we are judging our own behavior, i.e., when we are the actor, we attribute our actions to the prevailing situation. When we are judging other people’s behavior, i.e., when we are observers, we are more likely to attribute it to their character. Actor-observer bias is evident when subjects explain their own reasons for liking a girlfriend versus their impressions of others’ reasons for liking a girlfriend.In social psychology, actor-observer bias or actor-observer asymmetry refers to our tendency of attributing the other person’s behavior to his personal disposition, and his own behavior to the situation he is facing. In contrast, observers tend to provide more dispositional explanations for a friend’s behavior ( Figure). This supports the idea that actors tend to provide few internal explanations but many situational explanations for their own behavior. In contrast, when speculating why a male friend likes his girlfriend, participants were equally likely to give dispositional and external explanations. The participants’ explanations rarely included causes internal to themselves, such as dispositional traits (for example, “I need companionship.”). When asked why participants liked their own girlfriend, participants focused on internal, dispositional qualities of their girlfriends (for example, her pleasant personality). One study on the actor-observer bias investigated reasons male participants gave for why they liked their girlfriend (Nisbett et al., 1973). However as observers, we have less information available therefore, we tend to default to a dispositionist perspective. As actors of behavior, we have more information available to explain our own behavior. The actor-observer bias is the phenomenon of attributing other people’s behavior to internal factors (fundamental attribution error) while attributing our own behavior to situational forces (Jones & Nisbett, 1971 Nisbett, Caputo, Legant, & Marecek, 1973 Choi & Nisbett, 1998). If you came home from school or work angry and yelled at your dog or a loved one, what would your explanation be? You might say you were very tired or feeling unwell and needed quiet time-a situational explanation. When it comes to explaining our own behaviors, however, we have much more information available to us. Due to this lack of information we have a tendency to assume the behavior is due to a dispositional, or internal, factor. The only information we might have is what is observable. Why do you think we underestimate the influence of the situation on the behaviors of others? One reason is that we often don’t have all the information we need to make a situational explanation for another person’s behavior. So a naïve observer would tend to attribute Greg’s hostile behavior to Greg’s disposition rather than to the true, situational cause. Returning to our earlier example, Greg knew that he lost his job, but an observer would not know.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |